Solutions / Agencies

AI visibility for agencies: a project per client, a brief across all of them, and a link the client can open

Answer Radar keeps each client in its own project, runs each on its own schedule, briefs you on every project at once, and lets a client see a measured result without a seat. It is not white label. Here is what it is instead.

Start with the Compete plan How share links work

Updated 2026-09-04

The agency shape, without an agency tier

Four features that exist today, composed for a client roster.

A project is one client: a domain, a brand name, the competitors it loses to, and an approved prompt set, with its own runs, gaps, fixes, schedule and Search Console connection. The brief iterates every active project on the account and reports each one's movement and open cards. Share links show one gap, run, fix or a project's metrics to someone without a Linkeddit account, summary only, for 30 days. And every one of those is a tool call in the MCP connector, so the monthly report can be assembled by your assistant from the same payloads the app renders.

The calls, and our own account on 4 September 2026

The project list is real. The share call is shown for its shape; we did not create a share on our production account to decorate this page.

answer_projects_list({ status: "active" })

answer_share_create({
  resource_type: "metrics",
  resource_id: "<client project id>",
  label: "Acme, September"
})

Through the Linkeddit MCP connector. A project id is the scope for every other call.

answer_projects_list, verbatim fields

project 1: domain linkeddit.com, brand_name Linkeddit, language English, status active, created 17 July 2026. 21 approved prompts, one audit run on 4 September.
project 2: domain linkeddit.com, brand_name null, language null, status active, created 17 July 2026. No prompts, no runs. This is what an unfinished setup looks like, and the brief reports it as nothing_meaningful_changed true rather than hiding it.
has_more: false
what share create returns: From the tool contract: a link that shows the summary only, never the underlying answer text or cited sources, expiring in 30 days. The full URL is returned once and cannot be recovered afterwards.

An agency account looks like this with one row per client instead of two rows for us. The brief, the usage position and the shares list are the three account-level views; everything else is per project.

The agency month, in five steps

Each step is a feature that exists today, and each is a tool call if you would rather assemble the report in Claude or Cursor.

Step 1

One project per client

A project is a domain, a brand name, its competitors, and an approved prompt set. Every metric, gap, fix and share is scoped to it. Nothing crosses between clients because nothing is stored above the project.

Step 2

Prompts grounded in the client's Search Console

The client adds our read-only service-account address as a user on their property. You never hold their credential, and the prompt set starts from what their buyers actually typed rather than what the pitch deck said.

Step 3

Schedules do the monthly run

Weekly or monthly per project, in the client's timezone. The run reserves credits first and obeys the same caps as a manual one, so a schedule cannot surprise you on the bill.

Step 4

The brief covers every client at once

One digest across all active projects: what moved, per engine, versus the equal window before, and which cards are new. Your assistant reads the payload and writes the client narrative; we do not.

Step 5

Share the result, keep the evidence

A share link to the project's metrics or one gap, summary only, 30 days by default, revocable. The client sees the result without a seat. The answer text and sources stay in your account.

The demand we can see for this page

From our own Search Console, 6 June to 3 September 2026. The phrasing is the brief for the page.

“ai brand monitoring software for client reporting”: 5 impressions at position 3.8.
“best ai brand monitoring tools with multi-client dashboards”: 5 impressions at 9.2.
“which ai monitoring vendors produce client-ready reporting an agency can put its name on?”: 27 impressions at 58.9. The honest answer to that one is above: not us, not as a feature.
“ai brand monitoring for agencies”: 2 impressions at 21.

What this is not

Said plainly, because the category's agency pages tend not to.

Not white label. A shared page carries Linkeddit's name. Client-branded reporting is something your assistant builds from the payloads, not a feature we ship.
Not a client dashboard. A share link shows one thing. A client who needs to browse the project needs a seat.
Not a case study. We have none from an agency that we can cite with permission, and we will not borrow an illustrative one.
Not unlimited. Credits are shared across the account's projects and every run reserves first. The usage tool tells you where you stand.
Not real-time. Each client project is measured on its schedule, weekly or monthly.

Frequently asked questions

Is there an AI brand monitoring tool built for agency client reporting?+

Answer Radar handles the agency shape without an agency tier: one project per client domain with its own prompts, competitors and schedule; a brief that covers every active project at once; and share links that show a client one result without buying them a seat. What it does not have is white label. A shared page carries Linkeddit's name, and we are not going to describe it otherwise.

Can I put my agency's name on the reports?+

No. Share links are Linkeddit pages showing your project's summary. If client-facing branding is the requirement, the honest route today is to read the digest and metrics payloads through the MCP connector and have your assistant produce the report in your own template. That is a real workflow and several of our users run it; it is not a white-label feature and this page does not call it one.

How do I keep clients separate?+

By project. A project holds its own domain, brand, competitors, approved prompts, runs, gaps, fixes, schedule and Search Console connection. Metrics, the content gap view and share links are all scoped to a project id. There is no cross-project view except the brief, which lists projects one after another with their own numbers.

What does a client see through a share link?+

The summary of one thing: for a gap, what was asked and who was recommended; for a run, its status and headline counts; for a fix, its title and status; for the project's metrics, the numbers with their disclosure. Not the answer text, not the cited sources, not any model identity. Links expire after 30 days by default and can be revoked immediately.

How does the pricing work across many clients?+

Answer Radar is included with the Compete plan at $99 a month. Runs draw on a monthly credit allowance, one credit per question asked of one engine, shared across the account's projects. Every scheduled or manual run reserves credits first, and the usage tool shows the position and the per-run cap before you start. If a client roster outgrows the allowance, talk to us rather than guessing from this page.

Do you have agency case studies?+

Not ones we will cite here. Of the 310 people who named an industry during onboarding, 29 said agency, and none has a public result we can quote with permission. When one does, it will appear on this page with the run ids behind it.

One project per client, one brief for you, one link for them

Answer Radar is included with the Compete plan, alongside the weekly competitor brief, in the browser and through the MCP connector.

See pricing Run it from your assistant