Asana and Linkeddit in Claude: SEO and AI visibility tasks you approve

The Asana connector gives an AI client access to the Asana Work Graph. Asana's developer page says its MCP server lets AI assistants access that graph from outside the Asana platform. The Agent Index listing shows 15 tools: 12 reads, such as get_tasks, get_projects, get_portfolios and search_objects, and 3 writes, create_task_preview, create_project_preview and update_task.

That is the work side. It knows your projects and owners. It does not know what the answer engines say about your category or which competitor just changed its pricing page. Linkeddit is the evidence side, on one plan at $60 a month. It records the findings and writes no advice, so your own assistant decides what becomes a task.

Asana publishes SEO templates for strategy, roadmaps, audits and rank tracking, and the SEO roadmap template is described as a place to plan audits, keywords, content and technical fixes, assign owners, set priorities and report KPIs. These are containers. You still have to find what belongs in them.

The gap is that the rows come from a person remembering to check. A task that says optimise the pricing page has no proof behind it. Linkeddit's Answer Radar action queue gives each card a type, a rank, a confidence score and counts of competitor mentions and citations, so the task Claude writes carries the reason it exists.

Templates hold the technical basics well. An SEO consultant on Reddit listed this item from their own checklist: "No noindex tags left on important pages (common after migrations)" What a template does not hold is evidence about the answers engines give today, which is the gap the cards fill.

Claude reads the open cards in Linkeddit's action queue and creates one Asana task per card. The queue generates two kinds today: content_gap, where your brand is absent from an answer, and competitor_won, where an engine names a competitor for a question you care about. Each card keeps its status, from suggested through todo and in_progress to done or dismissed.

Claude drafts the task with the question as the title and the evidence in the description. The connector's create_task_preview tool is a preview, so you see the task before it exists. Once you approve, Claude can move the Linkeddit card to in_progress, so the queue and the Asana board agree. The one page for this workflow has the exact prompt.

Yes, with the same pattern. Competitor moves come from Linkeddit's competitor monitors through compete_signals_get, and each signal carries a priority, so Claude can create tasks only for the high ones and leave the quiet week quiet. Nothing else about the Asana side changes.

Search Console queries come from gsc_queries_get, once the customer has connected Search Console. It has views for queries at average position 11 to 20 with real impressions, top five positions clicked less than expected, and queries with no dedicated page. Each view is a ready list of refresh tasks: one page per task, the query as the brief. A competitor move can also become an Asana task with an owner and a review date.

Check three things. First, the project: name it in the prompt, because search_tasks_preview and get_projects can read anything the signed-in account can see. Second, duplicates: ask Claude to search for an existing task with the same question before it creates a new one, since a queue refreshes and a finding can return.

Third, the preview. The Asana tools for creating are named create_task_preview and create_project_preview, so read what Claude proposes. Linkeddit's own queue says a dismissed card keeps suppressing its finding, and a completed one releases it, so a repeated task on the next run can be a real recurrence rather than a duplicate.

No. Claude acts when you start it, so the board changes when you run a saved prompt, or when a scheduler you already use starts a Claude session.

Linkeddit's side keeps time independently: competitor monitors and audit runs execute on their own schedule, so the queue is current whenever you ask. A weekly habit works well: run the prompt on Monday, approve the drafts, and let the Asana project hold the rest of the week.